You love the blog, so subscribe to the Beervana Podcast on iTunes or Soundcloud today!

Monday, December 06, 2010

Beer Law Madness in Colorado

This is insane. Thanks to an old law that will be enforced after January 1, where you can buy beer depends on how strong it is:

A state law in effect next year will force the owners of restaurants and bars to stop selling beer that contains low levels of alcohol....

Bars, restaurants and liquor stores can sell only beer that is above 4 percent alcohol by volume. Grocery and convenience stores are allowed to sell only alcohol with less than 4 percent alcohol by volume.
(That comes from two reports by the Denver Post: 1, 2.) The perverse law was not created by consumers, obviously, nor politicians concerned about public health, nor breweries. It was hatched by lobbyists for grocery and convenience stores. So, if you want a low-alcohol session in a pub, good luck. Have an imperial stout instead!

Expect to see this item return with my inaugural DMS awards later this month.

Ignore the Beer Geeks

Yesterday, I had the pleasure of returning to the Holiday Ale Fest one last time, and spending it with a couple of newbies. I've known them well over a decade, and was rocked to learn they'd never been to any beer fests. At a certain point, one of them hollered, "I love this!" I nodded sagely. The Beer Sherpa was pleased.

The experience was pleasurable for another reason, too. These two friends are quite big beer fans, but they aren't beer geeks. They don't study the history and definitions of style, they don't care about the chemistry, and they don't have a burning interest in trying every weird beer there is. They have honed the critical faculties to identify a good beer within the styles they like, and they apply this to the simple joy of drinking a tasty pint.

It occurred to me that the interests of the "advanced amateurs" (for want of a better phrase) and beer geeks can often be quite a bit different. Beer geeks spend a huge amount of their time and energy--especially at beer fests--pursuing extremely esoteric beers. Sally and I were the first to arrive at HAF, and I had my first ale in hand--the Figgy Pudding Olde Stock. For some reason, that pour was quite a bit warmer than Thursday's and also expressed a great deal more brett character. It had a sharp, dry-leather quality that overwhelmed most of the more nuanced sugars and fruit flavors in the recipe. When my friends arrived, I had them sample it, and then had to go into a long song and dance trying to describe what Block 15 had been shooting for. They were polite but it was clear that their view about the bottom line wasn't going to change: not tasty.

Beer geeks, by dint of having tried hundreds or thousands of examples of certain styles, tend not to spend a lot of time seeking those styles out or discussing them. Our own Doc Wort has been on a years-long jihad against breweries who make only familiar styles. But spend a little time with the average drinker, and you are reminded how joyful the experience of drinking a great porter, say, really is. There's a perverse kind of focus beer geeks place on certain kinds of beers--the barrel aged, the sour, the experimental.

But, if you were to draw a Venn diagram showing the beers 'advanced amateurs' and beer geeks like, you'd see enormous overlap.

All of this is fine, of course. I'm not about to start passing up the wild and wonderful, and the truth is, given a choice between sampling a nobly failed experiment and a solid classic beer style, I'll go for the noble experiment. (I might learn something!) That doesn't alter the fact that it's a failure.

Almost all of my friends are beer fans but not beer geeks. They have no interest in the intellectual pleasure of beer--they want the pleasure pleasure of a good beer. Yesterday's experience reminded me that we do a disservice to most drinkers when we focus only on the exotica. (Hell, we do a disservice to ourselves. My brain had completely filtered out Hop Valley's Festeroo, and English old ale, when I saw the list of beers. Pssh, English old ale--show me something I haven't seen. But it was fantastic!)

Mostly, people shouldn't listen to beer geeks. We have our own thing going on. Toward the end of our time at the Fest yesterday, my friend had settled into Eel River's Climax Noel ('09). He was blissfully going back for pour after pour. It was a bit sweet for my taste--but he didn't care about my taste. He had discovered his bliss without me.

Saturday, December 04, 2010

Go Ducks

Last year I was pulling for the Beavers, who had a Rose Bowl on the line. (They lost it.) This year, it's the Ducks with a national championship game at risk. I generally pull for the underdogs, but in the grand scheme of things, a Ducks national championship would be a triumph of the little guy. The 5-6 Beavs are mainly playing for spite (and a Toilet Bowl)--as good a reason as any--but this year, I'm a Duck man.

Three Good Ones At HAF

During yesterday's outing to the Holiday Ale Fest, I managed to cover a lot more terrain, and with just one exception, all the pours were in the good-to-excellent continuum. (The poor pour was Laurelwood's experimental black pepper Belgian ale, featuring too much pepper and a clash of disparate flavors.) But among the beers were three gems I wanted to highlight:
  • 2003 BridgePort Old Knucklehead Barleywine. Seven-year-old kegs are one of the central features that makes HAF special. Not all aged beers work, but when they do, there's nothing like them. This keg had been well-handled and was only mildly oxidized. It was marked by a port-like, long sweetness, full of caramel. Amazing.
  • Hopworks Kentucky Christmas. Mixing bourbon and hops is a risky business, but when it works, it works like a Swiss watch. The flavors locked together perfectly, balancing each other in almost shamefully tasty harmony.
  • Widmer Black Dynamite. Flying under the radar is the most successful spiced experiment I tried. The black pepper and chocolate are both very assertive elements, and the result is dessert-rich. I'm not sure what I'd think about a pint, but the small pour I had was like liquid dark chocolate, dense and decadent.
If you're headed into the scrum today, make sure you try the last two. I would also give a shout-out to Double Mountain Bockus (but make it your first beer--you won't appreciate its subtleties once your palate is blasted), Block 15 Figgy Pudding, which strikes me as the closest recreation of an English old ale I've encountered, and Ninkasi's Unconventionale, which is far more harmonious than last year's. I got heather, but not so much of the lavender.

Happy sipping--

Friday, December 03, 2010

How Wine Markets are Different From Beer Markets, and How They Aren't

Oregonian columnist Steve Duin had a fascinating piece in yesterday's paper about the Oregon wine market. Locally, wine and beer are regarded as pretty similar products: rapidly expanding, artisan-made, small-market products with a strong international reputation. This conceals the differences between the markets for these products, which are legion. And, based on Duin's article, the wineries are in for a big fall.

(Backgrounder. Oregon's western climate is cool, and the growing season is short. Most grapes don't do well here. The exception is pinot noir, which can be coaxed along to produce world-class wines the equal of those from Burgundy. Almost all of Oregon's acreage is devoted to pinot noir and pinot gris (92%). Because of the conditions, though, an acre will produce two tons of grapes, not the five that emerge from fecund California vineyards. Duin quotes one winemaker who observed that "it's phenomenally expensive to farm" in Oregon. As a consequence, you often spend $30 for a bottle of wine grown 30 miles away.)

The craft beer market has continued to enjoy robust growth, and even three or four years ago people began to wonder if it was sustainable. But craft breweries grow by the single digits each year in Oregon. Compare that to wine:
Between 2004 and 2008, Hatcher says, the number of Oregon wineries doubled, to 400, as hobby farmers and other opportunists sought to take advantage of the growing celebrity of Oregon’s pinot noir grape.
So here we have a region famous for a style of grape and capable of producing world-class examples. So what has the industry been focusing on?
But that campaign has been undercut by the sub-appellation movement, in which a small number of Oregon wineries want consumers to believe that acreage producing its second vintage is the next Heitz Martha’s Vineyard cab, eucalyptus leaves and all.

“When half of America can’t find Afghanistanon a map, how can we expect them to parse the difference between Chehalem Mountain and the Eola Hills?” Hatcher asks. “We’re making it more and more confusing.”
According to Duin, who believes half the wineries will be gone in ten years, this is a monumental blunder. Wineries should be cashing in on the mystique of Oregon, not the subtle distinctions that distinguish the terroir in the Willakenzie loam from Ribbon Ridge.

So much is different in the way wine and beer are produced. Wine is dependent on nature--it is a born beverage, not a made one. Beer is a matter of chemistry and recipe, closer to a restaurant meal than agricultural product. In some other ways, though, beer has some shared qualities.

I was recently talking to John Holl, the New Jersey beer writer. On the East Coast, they get just a couple Oregon beers. When I described the diversity of beer styles brewed locally, he was shocked. A brewery devoted to farmhouse ales? A barrel house that serves mainly sours? States or regions have not done a lot to articulate a sense of place in the beer world. Because the local market is so good, breweries haven't had to venture out into the national market to sell their products. As a consequence, breweries mainly try to figure out how to distinguish themselves from each other in this variety-rich landscape. For breweries, there's no reason to think of ways to present Oregon or Northwest beer as a kind of "appellation."

Anyway, it got me thinking. In Oregon, beer and wine are superficially similar in so many ways. But they're actually hardly alike at all.

Thursday, December 02, 2010

Holiday Ale Fest in 312 words

I made a blitzkrieg stop at the Holiday Ale Fest. Sort of a preview before tomorrow's more serious visit when Sally can join me. These are my comments, in lightning-round fashion:
  • Lompoc Franc'ly Brewdolph. A nice beer, and a nice demonstration of what the Ardennes yeast can do if you give it some time. I'd have liked some more depth, and maybe a sour twist at the end, but life is full of small disappointments. B+
  • Deschutes Jubel 2000. In my review, I confused this with 2000 Jubelale. No. This is their special millennial beer. Sadly, I found it murky, metalic, and dissipated. The flavors had drained out of it. I heard praise here and there, but I stand by my tongue on this one. C+
  • Boneyard Femme Fatale. I had the sense that this beer was soured mainly by the cranberries. It was overly sweet and one-dimensional, but with a bit of lactobacillus, it might have sung. C+
  • Gilgamesh Cranberry Saison. A strange beer. It had an odd, metallic aroma and a sharp, tinny note backed up by thin wheatiness. And yet I sort of liked it. I felt like it could be a beta version of a wonderful beer--perhaps with a bit more oomph. B-
  • Lucky Lab Pavlov's Stout. Ah, here we go. A massive, burly, tasty, rich, boozy, lovely imperial stout. Right in the old Alworth wheelhouse. B+
  • Columbia River Paddler's Porter. Wow. I have rarely tasted a beer so un-beerlike. Toss in a few marshmallows, pop it in the microwave, and the kiddies would call it Nestle. I see why it's wildly popular, and it was beguiling, but even as I enjoyed it, I felt compromised. B
I still haven't had my Spalding Gray-esque perfect beer moment, which is good (though Pavlov would serve in a pinch). Gives me reason to return.

Mr. Tech and the Holiday Ale Fest

Whoo-boy, look at me go. In the left-hand column, you'll see a live twitter feed that is updated with hashtags #haf2010 or #holidayalefest. I intend to begin adding my own when I arrive for the first time this afternoon.

Some people have questioned the value of Twitter--and perhaps rightly so. But I've discovered that when you link it up to live events, the chatter that emerges from them creates a kind of real-time snapshot of the event. Kari Chisholm pioneered this at BlueOregon with political events, and I am slowly trying to follow suit. Want to find out what the buzz beers are? Want to find out what just came on or just blew? Crowd-sourcing the info is a great way to go.

Anyway, enjoy. And remember, use the correct hashtags!

Shipping Beer to Leeds?

I have corresponded to Zak Avery over the antique Greene King, and he plans to ship it here via slow boat to defray costs. Wise. I can't believe he's willing to part with it at all, so picking up the tab to send it seems to require a gesture of thanks. I plan to send him a bottle of Oregon's finest by way of thanks. Which raises these questions:
  1. How do you cheaply send beer to Leeds, England? I think slow boat is the way to go, but I'm not sure where to go. Post Office? Will they take beer?
  2. Which beer?
Please comment on either question. I am particularly keen to know the first, but the second is interesting just as a matter of inquiry. (I'll probably pull something out of my cellar, which limits the choices.)

Help!

Wednesday, December 01, 2010

Holiday Ale Fest, the Mostly-Pilfered Preview

On Sunday night, as I dined on Italian in Boston's North End, the Brotherhood of Portland Beer Bloggers Local 503 were treated to a screening of some of the Holiday Ale Fest beers. So, coming into this fest, one of the signature events of the year, I am flying blind. But thanks to the hard work of those bloggers, you don't have to. Behold, the labors of my thieving, as I collect together the wisdom of the bloggers and offer it to you.

General Comments
First, it's worth throwing out a few links. The official website is rich with data, including a list of the beers, a downloadable program (.pdf), and a list and release schedule for the special, single-keg beers that will pour. The truth is, you will not sample all the good beer at this fest. There's way too much of it. You will also blunder and devote some stomach space to "meh" beer. Thems the facts at any fest. However, pay attention to Twitter (I think the predominant hash tag is #HolidayAleFest) and watch the blogs. I will probably not be able to make my usual Saturday run, so I'll be weighing in after evening jaunts. I probably won't be alone. [Update. It looks like #haf2010 may actually be the go-to hashtag. Stay tuned.)

Okay, now onto the picks and pans. I have stolen these reviews from the estimable bloggers at It's Pub Night, 999 Beers, The New School, Portland Beer and Music, The Not So Professional Beer Blog, and Brewpublic. Since I am not fully reproducing all their wisdom, I strongly encourage you to click through and read their posts yourself.

Consensus Winners
Although we have a pool of six blogs, it actually results in nine reviews, thanks to the New School's group approach. Two beers were cited by eight reviewers as standouts; the next highest-grossing beers rang in at five. In other words, these are absolute musts:
  • Cascade Brewing Sang Noir. "5/5, Booyah!" (999 Beers). "A real sour-lover's beer" (Samurai Artist, The New School).
  • Lompoc Franc'ly Brewdolph. "Think aged Jubelale, with a Belgian nose and a hint of red wine." (It's Pub Night). "Aged in Cabernet Franc barrels for 13 months and then blended with Brewdolph" (Not So Professional beer Blog). "A brilliant winter beer all around." (Ben Edmunds, New School).
Good Bets
The next duo garnered love from about half the reviewers (five citing them as must-tries). That means there's a fifty-fifty chance you'll love these beers--not bad.
  • Columbia River Paddler's Porter. This is the new brewery that took over the Laurelwood Pizza House location. They make a surprisingly impressive debut. "A big, rich chocolate and vanilla porter with a roasty aroma," (Jacob Grier, New School). "A deep chewy seven-malted lager," (Brewpublic).
  • Alameda Papa Noel's Midnight Reserve. ""A nice whiskey oak nose, earthy hop flavor, caramel malt sweetness, and lingering bitterness." (Ritch Marvin, New School). "Like a slightly richer Full Sail Wassail." (It's Pub Night).
Love 'Em or Leave 'Em
Finally, our last pairing seemed to really divide the group. They got mostly positive notices (four called them must-tries), but they also got singled out for opprobrium. In other words, your mileage may vary:
  • Block 15 Figgy Pudding, Olde Stock. Raves: "This version is aged with a wild yeast strain that provides a bit of earthiness and funk (good funk) that’s not present in the bottle version," (Not So Professional Beer blog). "Huge raisin-y, figgy thing going on; must try," (999 Beers). Rant: "Too boozy, and surprisingly bitter," (It's Pub Night).
  • Natian Old Grogham IPA. Raves: "Very rich, creamy and chewy, but with tons of grassy and spicy hops," (Samurai Artist, New School). "Rum-soaked Oregon oak spires were added during the final stages of fermentation to compliment this high alpha 8.5% ABV 86 IBU lupulin bomb," (Brewpublic). Rant: "The only IPA at the fest. I didn't like it," (Portland beer and Music.)

Pig in a Poke
The media preview was pre-selected by Preston Weesner, the fest's beer-wrangler, to illustrate the range of beers available. That means he left out lots of beers that might otherwise have been rated must-tries by the Brotherhood of Bloggers. Which are those must tries? Here are my best guesses:
  • Boneyard Femme Fatale. A raspberry/cranberry sour ale from a brewery about which I am totally ignorant. But a fruit sour--nice beer to debut with!
  • Breakside Belge d'Hiver. Mainly because I'm a sucker for beers with French-language titles.
  • Collaborator Aegir's Cauldron. A barrel-aged Baltic Porter.
  • Double Mountain Bockus. Apparently a dark doppelbock (schwarzbock?)--and one of the few lagers at the fest.
  • Fort George North the Fourth. North III was one of the best last year, so I look forward to this year's editkion--made with candy canes, spruce tips, and cranberries.
  • Hopworks Kentucky Christmas. The amazing Abominable Ale aged in bourbon casks.
  • Lucky Lab Pavlov's. Not so many stouts this year, but this imperial was aged in pinot barrels.
  • Widmer Black Dynamite. Brewer Scott Kacek added chocolate nibs, lemon zest, and peppercorns to this Baltic Porter.
Special Beers
Almost every beer pouring in limited release looks fantastic. No matter when you go, be sure to check the website to see what will be pouring then. But, if like me you arrange your fest-going around the release times of these beers, you might consider:
  • Wednesday, 2pm. New Belgium Love (2009). The base beer for the brewery's sour line.
  • Thursday, 2pm. Deschutes Oak-aged Jubel (2000). I don't know if this was a stronger batch than usual, so it may be a bit gone, but I'm willing to try.
  • Friday, 2pm. BridgePort Old Knucklehead (2003). Hair of the Dog JIM (2009). Seven-year old barleywine is just hitting its adolescence, and the JIM '09 was the best since '07.
  • Saturday, 2pm. Fort George North III. As I mentioned, this was a fantastic beer, and a year later, it should be fantasticker.

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

The Beers of New England -or- Is the US Becoming Less Regional?

Travel posts are always hard. Most of my readership lives on the West Coast, so it matters little what amazing beer I drink when I'm in New England. Anyone who happens to have access to the beer I discuss, however, doesn't need my Johnny-come-lately evaluation. So rather than just going through the beers, let's put it in context: how are the beers of the East Coast evolving with regard to those on the West Coast?

I first started visiting New England in the 90s, and the beer I found there was different from West Coast beer. It was more traditionally English--the beer styles were mostly English and brewed at English strengths and with English-inflected spicy hopping. This may have been because I was influenced by the especially British Maine breweries, Gritty McDuff's, Shipyard, and Geary's. But even in other regional breweries, where Cascade hops were deployed, the overall character was much more toward balance and drinkability. Harpoon IPA, one of my faves, is a modest 5.9% and 42 IBUs (all Cascade). This struck me as totally appropriate--New England has much about it that reminds me of old England, and so I was pleased to see the beer did, too.

This complemented my experience from earlier in the decade, when I lived in Madison, Wisconsin. There, craft breweries produced a whole lot more lager, and their ales were lighter and less fruity than the West Coast examples. Again, appropriate for a region settled in large measure by Germans.

Fast-forward to 2010. This year my brewery sample size was just two: Portsmouth Brewery in New Hampshire and Sunday River Brewpub in beautiful Bethel, Maine. However, my brother-in-law also brought up quite a selection from his area, near DC. That gave me a slightly broader sense of what was happening on the East Coast. What I observed led me to wonder if we weren't beginning to see a nationalization of craft brewing.

Let's start where I did, at Portsmouth Brewing. It's the lesser-known half of a New Hampshire duo that also includes Smuttynose. The latter is a production brewery, the former a brewpub, and both are fairly venerable by craft standards (16 and 19 years). For some reason, I've never stopped in at Portsmouth Brewery, despite passing through the city every visit to New England. That will change. The place is an absolutely perfect pub--lots of character, warmth, and charm. When you think of pub, this is the place that comes to mind. It also boasts a pretty amazing beer list and well above-average food. (I had the mussels, a house specialty. They come in a traditional preparation or a curried version. I went curried and was shocked and delighted when they delivered the plate containing 4-5 dozen.)

The beers vary, but here's what was on tap when we visited: a blonde, IPA, imperial IPA, dunkel gose, smoked dunkelweizen, and oatmeal stout. (They also had some Smuttynose beers.) Oregonians, ask yourselves: doesn't that sound familiar? These beers were perfectly consonant with the varieties being brewed on the West Coast. Moreover, they were very well made.

The gose was less lactic but saltier than Oregon versions--a nice alternative and it seemed pretty authentic (sour mash, no lacto). The smoked dunkel was strange--hand crab apple smoked malt was sharp but clean (no meaty flavors) and melded nicely with the surprising phenols from the weizen yeast. The IPA was vibrantly bitter but one-dimensional, while the double IPA was multilayered and accomplished. (Van Havig would have liked the aroma, which was identical to tinned pineapple.) The huge winner was the oatmeal stout, with 30% oats in the grist. It was served on nitro and the head was mousse-like. And not in the sense that it evoked mousse--it was seriously thick and full of substance. It had a bit of roast and slightly vinous quality. Amazing beer.

So, to recap: two IPAs, two experimental beers, a blonde for the beginners, and a stout. Tres West Coast. (In another national trend, they release an imperial stout in bottles in March called Kate the Great and it produces a scrum before selling out in minutes. The brewer here, Tod Mott, seems to favor stouts.)

Well, fair enough. I suspected I'd just stumbled on one of those rare, exceptional breweries, and they had the qualities that mark all great breweries: broad interests, clever insights, and fun, experimental beer. But then we traveled on to Bethel, Maine, where the local is Sunday River Brewpub. It's located just down the hill from a ski resort and gets lots of business in the early afternoons, as ski bums come in to whet their whistles. A far more common type of pub, it features a regular line-up with just a few rotating specialties, and these seem to recur.

The regular beers include the flagship and my fave, a nicely-balanced, spicy IPA. I nodded sagely--a classic New England IPA. Except they also have a "NW-style" pale and a double IPA. (Also an alt and a porter--and my in-laws all drank the porter, which illustrates what I knew, that they are good and wholesome people.) The pale wasn't great--it was a bit worty and the hops were overstressed and weedy. The DIPA was a monster, though--10%, and hopped such that it would take no crap from anything brewed out here. So, to recap: three hoppy beers, an alt, and a porter. Again, Oregonians, see anything familiar?

One should be cautious about making broad generalizations based on such scant info. But what the hell, let's be incautious. I was dumbstruck to find Portsmouth pouring a gose. This is among the most recent of the Portland trends, and here it is in New Hampshire, too. Imperial IPAs, once scorned and derided by brewers elsewhere, have become standards--even, obviously, in staid New England.

One of the things that had protected regions from outside influence was an insularity both among breweries, but also customers. But twenty years on, customers and breweries both encounter lots of cross-fertilization from other regions of the country. This is probably both a function of the maturation of consumer palates, but also reflects the desire of brewers to experiment. It may just be the way of things, but I lament it a little. Finding a gose is cool, but when you're really looking for, say a cask bitter brewed with Fuggles, it's a little disappointing not to find it. On the other hand, things change. Maybe these are just fads and customers will demand a return to the types of beers New England made when I first started visiting.

Either way, I plan to research the trend.

Who Wants to Try Some Beer From 1936?

Really? I don't believe it:
However, like Highlander, there can be only one, and that one is Jeff Alworth. Jeff's entry was posted after the deadline, and so his win is sure to upset a few people, not least Matt Lovatt who submitted his entry 4 minutes before the competition deadline. To add further insult to injury, Jeff didn't even email me to tell me about his contribution, it just popped up in a Google alert (come on, we all have Google alerts on our names don't we?).
That's Zak Avery, who recently held a contest to see who would take home a 1936 bottle of Coronation Ale from Greene King. The idea was to get folks to wax poetic about beer and time and then select a winner. I didn't manage to get my post done on time, but liked the topic enough to write about it anyway. And miracle of miracles, I was apparently granted an extension on the assignment, and was rewarded with this beauty:


The back-story is fascinating. Back in January 1936, Edward VIII became the King of England, following the death of his father, George V. Apparently it was customary for breweries to offer special beers celebrating the event, and so Greene King whipped up Coronation Ale. However, scandal burned through Buckingham Palace as it emerged that the new king planned to marry--prepare yourselves--an American divorcée. Such were the politics of the time that this threatened to bring down the government.

Yes, amazing as it may seem to our American minds, the mostly-ceremonial position of hereditary monarch does actually have some swing in Britain--and had more so then. The Prime Minister would have resigned and sent the country into a crisis. Edward had a decision to make: the lady or the throne. He rather admirably chose the lady (though he apparently harbored less-admirable pro-Nazi sympathies, so maybe this was all for the best). He ruled only 325 days and was never formally coronated, and so Green King's cellar of special beers sat, unlabeled, for 74 years.

If, somehow, Zak thinks he can get me this beer, and if he does, I plan to do something big. As I mentioned in my winning post, beer is a product of time and place, and stands as a historical document. This isn't just any 74-year-old beer, it's one wrapped up in political intrigue and international politics.

In any case, thanks to Zak for spreading the wealth, and thanks to all the entrants who got their submissions in on time. Please don't kill me if ever we should cross paths. I'll buy the first round--

Monday, November 29, 2010

Good to Get Back to Oregon

I love New England and was a little sad to leave. The days were crisp and snowy, the nights filled with a cornucopia of beers brought up from the DC area by my brother-in-law. I could have stayed for weeks. But we flew home via Dallas, and I was reminded that not every place is Beervana. (My momma taught me that if you don't have anything nice to say about the hometown of a former President, note it in a short parenthetical and move on.)

I have lots of remedial blogging to do, and it will commence tomorrow. In the meantime, I was greeted by a link that warmed my frozen heart: Ninkasi's Believer is tearing it up in Wired Magazine's beer bracketology. (Session Black is hanging in, too.) That's Satori Award-winning Ninkasi Believer.

All is right with the world--

Great Moments in Beer

Always late to the party--that's my trademark. I had meant to throw in my contribution in Zak Avery's amazingly generous competition to win a pre-WWII bottle of Greene King. Alas, the competition expired three days ago. That's no reason not to take Zak up on his challenge, however:
To enter the competition, all you have to do is write something about beer and time, up to a maximum of 500 words.
Here goes.

Let us imagine Berlin in the the 1800s. Lots of horses and men with exotic facial hair. Poorly lit. Fragrant. And then there's this: 700 breweries producing Berliner Weisse. Seven hundred. In England at the same time the popularity of porters was such that it rebounded south, provoking the development of schwarzbier (that's one origin story, anyway, and we'll rely on it for the sake of this post) and west, where the Irish took it in a different direction. Goses, newly popular in America, were once wildly popular in Leipzig where they were considered the hometown style.

And so on. Porters yet thrive, but Berliner Weisse is on life support and goses have already died out once. Examine the history of brewing styles and you see the steady march of cultures. Weather, agriculture, laws, wars, technology, commerce, and taste trends all shape the types of beer that have been brewed and the reasons those types appeared.

What interests me in all of this is not just history, but the current moment. Something like three pubs close each day in Britain, while a new brewery opens perhaps once a week in the US. Portland, Oregon boasts 36 breweries, tops in the world, and this may represent either a high-water mark, or the midway point in a 50-year trend. (Thirty-six is fewer than 700.)

Or take gose, the dead style that was revived with a couple recent German examples. American breweries have taken up the gauntlet, and now the style is common enough that I discovered yet another example by chance in Portsmouth, NH. BeerAdvocate lists 24, 19 from the US. Will this style find commercial success and, if so, where?

I have a strong sense that the US is experiencing a rare flourishing in brewing history, when things are unsettled. Rare is the moment when gose could credibly become a mainstream beer, but now is such a moment. Perhaps the moment will last a century, perhaps just another few years. That bottle Zak offered is 73 years old. Let's imagine the world in another 73 years, as our descendants regard a bottle of beer from this era. What will that world look like? What will the popular styles be? Will there be more or fewer breweries in the US?

Who knows--maybe beer will be extinct, another luxury sacrificed so people can still grow precious food grains in a globally-warmed world. I can't really imagine what it means that there were 700 Berliner Weisse-producing breweries, and maybe this time will be just as inconceivable. In any case, it's a safe bet that nowhere on earth have so many styles been brewed at one time in one country. A 73-year-old bottle of American beer from 2010 could contain nearly any style of beer known, and that is perhaps the strongest comment on our current era. Enjoy it--

Saturday, November 27, 2010

Saturday at Sunday River

I write from beautiful and wintry Bethel, Maine, where I'm enjoying an IPA at the

Sunday River Brewing Co. They have a pretty tasty alt and porter as well, but the flagship is the standout. (A few snowflakes are falling lazily down--whether it's evident in this photo remains to be seen.)

A couple days ago, Sally and I drove through Portsmouth, NH--where there is a fantastic brewery and possibly the best oatmeal stout I ever tasted (key: 30% oats in the grist). On nitro, the head was thick enough you could float a brick on it.

I'll write more--but all in good time. Now I have a football game and this IPA to attend to.

Update. The snowflakes are no longer lazy.

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Happy Thanksgiving

Versions of what we call Thanksgiving have been celebrated for thousands of years. Harvest festivals, feasts--these must be as old as civilization itself. Even our particular habit of offering thanks is hardly new; in the high-mortality, season-by-season existence of the old days, offering thanks was nothing special. Cool, no Black Death this year!

This makes it the most univeral of holidays, moored to no specific culture or religious tradition--and maybe the most American. At least in our current version of the Thanksgiving story, we tell the fable of Europeans and Native Americans breaking bread in cooperation. It's an immigrant story, and a story of proto-democracy. It is a template for the national myth.

Since, by habit, we cite our specific thanks, let me make that mine. No one gets to claim Thanksgiving or mentally exclude others. It's one of the very few times of year when the identity of "American" muscles others out of the way. I'm thankful for the moment to enjoy my whole country, north to south, red to blue.

That and the beer. But I'm always thankful for that.

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Sorry, Charlie, They Are Industrial

At some point, I’ll review Beer is Proof God Loves by Charlie Bamforth. He’s an eminent scholar of brewing, but based on this book may have missed his calling: he’s a born blogger. So, in the spirit of his blogginess, I will milk the book for a couple posts before I get to the formal review. Today’s riff stems from Bamforth’s confusion about how to refer to multinational breweries. Confused because he first argues this way (in both the text and a footnote):
Many of the [brewing students at UC Davis], it must be said, are intent on the craft sector, however mistakenly regarding the big guys as corporate America, and some of them naively buying into the notion of “industrial beer.” [This] reprehensible term [is] sometimes employed by a thoughtless few in the craft sector to describe the products of the largest brewing companies…. The bigger brewing companies adhere to the very highest quality standards and are just as unlikely to use process aids as are smaller companies.
And then one page later, he offers this anecdote cum observation:
I was dismayed to hear a little while back of one chief executive saying that only a tiny proportion of his employees really mattered to him, because they represented the difference between success and failure. It straightaway put me in mind of my old boss, Robin Manners, chief executive of Bass Brewers and grandson of the company’s erstwhile chairman. He said to me one day, “Two things matter to this company, Charlie: One is people, and the other is quality. And if you look after the people, they will ensure the quality.” What a contrast.
And yet one page further:
The simple reality is that business decisions, especially in publicly-owned companies, are made on the basis of the bottom line and no consideration of tradition or status quo, unless it satisfies a marketing strategy.
And finally:
On November 18, 2008, the acquisition of Anheuser-Busch by InBev … created one of the top five consumer products companies in the world and a company producing around 400 million hectoliters of beer annually, with the next biggest competitor, SAB-Miller, standing at 210 million hectoliters.
Teasing apart the differences between, say a 5,000 barrel craft brewery and a 50-million barrel multinational corporate brewing company has been sabotaged by history and Bamforth, a Briton (see p. 177, footnote 17) is caught in the crossfire. There are a few issues, so lets tease them apart:

1. Corporations vs small business
A corporation is a legal entity and as far as I know, the term doesn't have anything to do with size. "Corporate" is shorthand in the US to mean "large company" (either private or public). There is no way, under any definition, for anyone to conclude that Budweiser InBev (or whatever they call the beast), a "top five consumer products company" is not corporate. It just is. I think what trips Bamford up here is the naked hatred many Americans have for corporate beer. This is an artifact of American consolidation, for which there is no analogue in British brewing. We watched as local breweries were gobbled up by bigger breweries--always resulting in less consumer choice (not to mention ripping the hearts out of drinkers who watched their local breweries dismantled). By contrast, as Bamforth documents, as late as 2000, Bass had just 25% of the British market, and number 2 Whitbread 16%. It was possible to see big breweries succeed in Britain and not associate this with violence done to the product.

2. Ingredients
Charlie also objects to this belief Americans hold that industrial beer is tainted with nasty ingredients. Let's leave aside the adjuncts. (Rice, Bamforth argues, is chosen for "certain quality attributes" and is actually "more complicated to use" than barley. I personally agree--rice is a natural grain and no less worthy an ingredient than any other. The "attributes" it contributes, however, and the reasons these attributes are prized by industrial breweries, are not uniformly admirable.) I don't have any reason to believe that industrial beer is currently adulterated with additives, nor that it was back in the 70s when nearly all products were (emulsifiers and stabilizers and enhancers and so on). But that's what people believe, and they believe it in part because when massive American conglomerates began consolidating in the 70s and 80s, the beer got blander and more tinny tasting. That's what happens when you're focused purely on the bottom line.

3. Industrial v hand-crafted
I have long looked for an adjective to use to distinguish between that 5,000 barrel brewhouse and the 50-million barrel one, ultimately settling on the value-neutral "industrial." Massive brewing companies can and do produce world-class beers and, as we all know, tiny breweries can and do produce drain cleaner. But, when you're brewing beer in vessels large enough to supply a small town with water for a week, you're working on an industrial scale. Every single brewery I have ever toured has done its damnedest to reduce the "hand" part of the crafted. Grain, kegs, and cases are heavy. Hand-bottling and labeling is extremely slow. To the extent they can streamline things, they do. Industrial breweries have just done this on a very large scale. Often, it allows them to hire skilled workers who get union wages. (When Henry's closed, 200 union jobs were lost.) So use "big" and "small" or "industrial" and "craft," or nomenclature of your invention. But at least recognize that brewing is largely an industrial endeavor.

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Incidentally, I'm in Boston

And I'll be headed to Maine tomorrow. I considered trying to track down a brewpub, but you know, there are cooler things in Boston. Sally and I went to the North End for Italian and then to the 70-year-old (and therefore mis-named) Modern Pastry for cannoli. Plus we paid homage to the revolution, which I have a hard time resisting. Blogging will continue as normal, but commenting here and elsewhere will be slow.

We parked next to the Boston Garden and paid a guy who was dressed head-to-toe in Red Sox paraphernalia. His accent was so think it was only occasionally recognizeable as English.


Paul Revere's wooden house, built 1680. Gives me hope that ours (1925) will survive my lifetime.


Revere, with the Old Church in the background. ("One if by land...")


From inside the Old Church, looking to the courtyard.


Never mind the beer, take the cannolis.

Review: "Yeast" by Chris White and Jamil Zainasheff

Yeast: The Practical Guide to Beer Fermentation
Chris White and Jamil Zainasheff

Brewers Publications, $19.95
Beer books can be divided generally into two huge categories: brewing and appreciation. I wish it weren't so. Everyone who appreciates good beer would do well to pick up a few key books on brewing, just to have a sense of how things works. Yeast, the latest from Brewers Publications, is a case in point. Although it has way more technical information than an appreciator needs (and even most homebrewers), it has the kinds of explanations of the brewing process that you can never find in books solely about flavor and styles. So, for the person who wants a deep understanding of the way their beer tastes, understanding how it was brewed and what effected its flavor are essential. I would recommend Yeast to pretty much anyone--though admittedly, the non-brewers would probably hate me for it.

It's a bit of a funny book in that it's aimed at both the small-scale professional and the advanced homebrewer. The writers, White (founder of White Labs, a yeast manufacturer) and Zainasheff (a homebrewer) oscillate between providing information for commercial-scale brewing and advanced homebrewing. Since I only aspire to advanced homebrewing and am not a commercial brewer, it's not clear to me how well they split the difference--though obviously, combining the audiences makes more sense for book sales.

In any case, you will learn everything about yeast, from the chemical composition to the behavior under every imaginable circumstance, in this book. You'll learn about attenuation, flocculation, inoculation rates, temperature, and the compounds yeast produces. It's designed to be a reference, so you skip past certain parts and re-read other parts. About eighty pages of the book describe how to set up a lab and what you can do in it; maybe one day I will need to know that, but I was happy to just thumb through.

I could go on and on, but this one is a no-brainer: buy it. Everyone should have a copy on her shelf.

Monday, November 22, 2010

Roscoe's Black Friday Beer Summit

Okay, this is something I can totally get behind. While the hordes are rampaging through the malls this Friday, the wise among us will be sipping good beer. Roscoe's has a great event planned: sort of a mini Holiday Ale Fest. Sixteen beers, including some fairly obscure ones:
Some of the breweries and holiday beers featured will be: Amnesia (Sleigh Jerker), Deschutes (Forest Park Strong Ale), Cascade (Dark Day Winter IPA), St. Bernardus (Christmas), Kulmbacher (Eisbock), Double Mountain (Fa La La La La), Collaborator (2009 bourbon barrel aged Floodcraft), Fort George (Drunkin' Pumpkin), Oakshire, Hopworks, and many more. We will have 5 ounce tasters available.
Black Friday Beer Summit
Friday-Saturday, Nov 26-27, 2pm to close
8105 SE Stark

I will be in New England sipping different beers that day, so you'll have to go in my stead.

Brand Dissection: Ninkasi Brewing

In the fifth part of this ongoing series, I consider Ninkasi Brewing's brand. If you want to read previous editions, follow this link.

Background
Ninkasi has only been around since 2006, but it's already become one of the state's larger breweries. Co-founder Jamie Floyd was not new to either brewing or brewing in Eugene, having been with Steelhead for years before opening Ninkasi. (The other co-founder, Nikos Ridge, has a background in finance.) Floyd calls their approach the "Chico strategy" (after Sierra Nevada) to become the city beer of a smaller community and expand from there. Check. Now Ninkasi is expanding out, and actually sells more beer in Portland than Eugene. The brewery just installed a new 30 60-barrel system and has a new bottling line and lots and lots of capacity to grow.

The Name
Ninkasi is an obvious choice--so obvious I was amazed Floyd found it free of trademark. The name refers to the ancient Sumerian goddess of brewing, documented in a famous 4000-year-old hymn. But surely someone had already snatched it up? Someone had--Fritz Maytag, whose Anchor Brewery had used it for their Sumerian Beer Project. But, over the course of 15 years, the mark expired, and Floyd and Ridge were the first ones to discover its availability. It's a classic name, like Gambrinus, the patron saint of brewing. Interestingly, Floyd says it has the dual virtue of still being slightly obscure ("a lot of people think it's Japanese")--familiarity to beer geeks, intrigue to those outside the loop.

Elements of the Brand
Back when I first started writing about beer, BridgePort had just changed their line-up from the old, iconic nature labels to one of consistent brand identity. A PR woman told me at the time that they wanted to get away from beer branding to brand branding. The idea was that people would just order a "BridgePort," ignoring the style of beer. It alerted me to just how hard that is. Breweries are known for certain beers--rarely does the brand permeate the full line-up. With Ninkasi, that's not true.

Everyone knows what Ninkasi beer is: hoppy. There are variations on a theme, but most of the core lineup features pale beers of vibrant hoppiness. For this, Ninkasi has earned the enmity of some beer geeks (a minority), but from a branding point of view, it's impressive and rare. You can just order a Ninkasi and have a good idea of what you'll get. (When I visited the brewery last week, they had a Berliner Weisse on draft at the tap room, and Floyd agreed with a laugh when I said I bet his customers were shocked when they tasted it.) This may not be the direction every brewery wants to go, but for Ninkasi it works: they're delighted to be known as the hophead's beer.

Logo
Interestingly, Floyd and Ridge decided not to use goddess iconography. There's no visual reference to the goddess, just the name. Instead, the logo is a starburst pattern surrounding the Ninkasi "N."
"The logo itself is based on an Egyptian revival mirror that used to hang in my house. All the original branding was done by me and my ex-wife [Brianna Jackson]. She's a graphic artist by profession and so we created a lot of that stuff together. We wanted something that was modern but timeless and had a Middle Eastern feel to it. It said a lot without really having to say a lot."
The rays of the logo are echoed in some of the labels as well--Radiant and Maiden the Shade. Although Floyd didn't mention it, this seems like a nod--perhaps unconscious--to the crunchy vibe of Eugene. There's a strong streak of tie-dye running through the city, and Ninkasi channels it in subtle ways.

Colors
Since Ninkasi doesn't do images, the brand relies on colors. Each label has a strong, clear field--almost like a flag--which is pretty much the only thing that distinguishes one beer from another. This intentionally stark scheme emerged as a way for customers to distinguish beers by looking at the tap handle, and Floyd likes the way it makes Ninkasi stand out on grocery shelves, too: "But when you walk up to look at a row of bottles, you see a blur of things, they don’t come out. In some cases our beers are next to each other, and in some cases they are separated by style--so it's easy to identify them." (I can speak to how easy they are to spot, too; I'm colorblind, and a lot of colors are muddy and indistinct--Ninkasi's have pure, saturated colors.)

Music
Two of the beers are homages to heavy metal bands--which I've already written about (Maiden the Shade and Sleigh'r). I have wondered what this says about the brewery's tastes, and Floyd confessed that there were lots of resident metalheads there. But even these are part of the brand--Ninkasi has a side interest in promoting local bands and has even toyed with the idea of producing music. (Apparently they're big supporters of music in Boise, Idaho--which based on my youth there, could use it.)

Interestingly, the first beer Floyd ever brewed (at Steelhead) was called Starchild for the messiah figure in Parliament Funkadelic's mythology. So the link to music goes way back. Let me be the first to request that Dr. Hoppenstein be the next homage--funk's far cooler than metal. (Take it up in comments.)

Brand Success
Ninkasi's brand is consistent and distinctive, two clear markers of success. You don't mistake a Ninkasi label on a grocery shelf. But brands also reflect a company's identity, and the Ninkasi brand does a good job here, too. Ask ten beer fans what they think of Ninkasi, and I doubt you'll get a neutral opinion from more than one. The brewery knows what it's doing, and it doesn't wander in the weeds searching for direction. The brand is similarly confident and direct. I don't doubt that there are some who don't like it, but everyone recognizes it. In an increasingly crowded field, that's maybe the most important sign of success.