If I wanted water, I would have asked for water.


Monday, May 03, 2010

Cheers to Belgian Beers 2010: The Final Roundup

[Note: An update about the winner is at the end of the post.]

It's all in the yeast.

This was the fourth year of Portland's Cheers to Belgian beers, a fest in which participating breweries all work with a single yeast strain and brew recipes of their own choosing. I missed the first year, when breweries used the versatile Rochefort strain (which Double Mountain also uses). The last two years, though, with the Ardennes (La Chouffe) and Ingelmunster (Kasteel), were largely misfires. Those yeasts were finicky and tended to produce heavy, cloying beers. I've no doubt that given time, breweries could have made some great beers, but the beers at those fests weren't especially distinctive. This year's strain was a saison from Blaugies, both easy to work with and versatile. The beers? Far better than the past two years.

General comments. Although all the breweries used the saison yeast in primary, at least five went a step further and soured their beers with wild yeasts or bacteria. Two used sour mashes. On the one hand, you could argue this undermines the fest's purpose--everyone's supposed to use the same yeast. On the other, it shows that breweries are taking the yeast as a jumping-off point. They're developing beers that express the styles they want to brew. I heartily endorse this experimentation. As for the yeast, while it was versatile, it didn't seem to take to dark beers as well as light--at least when no souring was involved. Maybe someone smarter than me can explain that--or maybe it was just coincidence.

Sally and I tag-teamed, managing to sample at least half-pours of 17 beers. (We both liked two beers well enough to get second pours, and I gave my last ticket to Bill.) Of those 17, I tried only one beer I'd call a dud. Four were absolutely fantastic. The rest fell in the mid-range. Looking around at some of the early reviews, and based on talking with folks at the fest, I'd say this was similar to others' experience--though the beers we admired differed. Liking different beers--there's a lesson in that. Belgian breweries tend to take beers further down roads than breweries in other countries; Belgian beers are often sharp-elbowed and challenging. Even among those known as great beers, a minority of people will just flat-out dislike them. That we all appreciated different beers at this fest attests to the breweries' success in really exploring style and ingredients.

Take Oakshire, for example. It was a strong beer with four spices and a bold palate. When I spoke to people at the fest, they either liked it or disliked it. But interestingly, we all pretty much described it the same way. The spices were well-integrated, drawing out flavors that might have been fermentation characteristics (probably excepting the the grains of paradise). I think there were some fusel alcohols, to which my palate is especially sensitive, and so I found it harsh. But both Doc Wort and Derek gave it high marks. That's the nature of this fest--different strokes. The beers I admired got panned by others.

So, with that in mind, here are my reviews. I'll follow both Doc and Derek's lead--I'll go alphabetically (like Doc) and offer letter grades (like Derek). The four I liked all got As or A-minuses.
  • Big Horse Cuvee de Ferme. I loved this beer. Brewer Jason Kahler used a sour mash on one part of his blended beer; it gave the beer a gentle tang. He also included a small amount of beer soured with lactobacillus and pediococcus, which added a small amount of very sharp sour--though the overall effect was mild. It had neither the sharpness of lactic sour or the funkiness of a brett sour. The rye and wheat softened everything out, gave it a bit of bread and spice, and further softened the souring. Rating: A
  • Block 15 La Fermé de Demons. Everyone seemed to love this beer--except me. A triple-barrel aged beer with a bit of young brett. I found it overwhelmingly oaky--the sharp, dry tannic quality and sweet vanilla notes both suffused the beer. The brett hadn't had a chance to get going, either. I would love to see it aged longer, off that new American oak, and see what evolves. As it was, I felt like I tasted a zwickel from a work in progress. Promising, but incomplete. Rating: incomplete
  • Cascade Frite Galois. Let me draw your attention to one statistic: 4.6%. That's the ABV, and for those who think small beers can't rock the palate, I offer you Frite Galois. I'm sure Gansberg loves all his children equally, but I sort them into categories of sublime and merely damn good. Call this one damn good; a relatively gentle sour, a bit of apricot (which must have been esters, right?), and quite creamy mouthfeel. Rating: B+
  • Deschutes Tropisch Bruin. Tamarind is not a generic fruit. It has a particular flavor, and this beer was therefore itself particular. The brown ales at the fest seemed to bend toward a sour staleness. This had that, but also the funny tamarind (next time you're at a burrito joint, get a Jarritos Tamarindo and you'll know what the flavor is). Not at all sweet or sharp, just odd. One of those beers you're glad to try. Once. Rating: B-
  • Double Mountain Bonne Idée, Bonne Idée avec Kriek. Sally and I got a pour of each of these for the side-by-side. One of the beers that really suffered from the cold serving temperature, both were startlingly severe at first sip. They were sharply hopped, and then dried out to dust. Sally called them "stern." The kriek softened the palate a bit, but mainly added a cherry note. Clearly very well made and very intentional, but they require the kind of person who loves exceptionally dry, asutere beers. Rating: B-, B-
  • Fort George Magnifera Indica Belgae. Another beer where the additive--in this case mango--was impressively understated. I had to let it warm up before the fruit became evident--and then mostly just in the nose. It's a sweetish beer, and alcoholic, with a heavy, rich body. I would have liked to see more dimensions to it--there were few fruity esters or spicy notes. Good, but didn't knock my socks off. Rating: B
  • Green Dragon King Ghidorah. I hadn't planned to try this beer, but everyone was raving about it. (Ezra, however, predicted I wouldn't like it.) I had it pretty late in the fest, and my palate was failing me, but what I mainly got was booze and whiskey (it was aged in Rogue Whiskey barrels). I didn't really find much distinctive in it, and I'm getting tired of whiskey beers. Ezra was right--not for me. Rating C
  • Hopworks DiaBlato. This was the last beer of the day for me, and so you should regard my opinion with the most suspicion. Nevertheless, I could taste the sugar and immense alcohol in the beer. Too much for me, though others were giving it admiring marks. Too much power, too little finesse. (Of course, I was at the time blind to finesse, so.) Rating B-
  • Lucky Lab Doggie Kong. This was Sally's pour, and I didn't get a whole lot of it--partly out of choice. It was an interesting beer, but ultimately a misfire. Sour mashed, with a bit of lychee added, but no hops. The result was not a sour beer, but a very caramelly one. It was quite sweet (as you would expect), but I think the caramel was what put it over the top for me. I appreciated the experiment, but not so much the beer. Rating C-
  • Kennedy School The Life of Riley Honey Wheat. This was another beer we kept hearing good things about, so tried. Effectively a wit, with coriander and orange peel. Some fermentation characteristics--spice, notably--made it more interesting than an off-the-shelf wit, but the spices were overdone. Even splitting our pour, it was plenty. Rating: C
  • Oakshire La Ferme. (Discussed in the body of the post) Rating: C+
  • Rock Bottom Floreal IV. As we worked our way through the beers, Sally and I started dividing beers into those that had been designed to let the yeast express itself, and those that ignored the yeast. Floreal was the best we tried in expressing the character of the yeast. It was a very clean, crisp beer but also spicy and floral. It captured the essence of farmhouse ales to me--refreshing but rustic, elegant but approachable. Another of my big faves. Rating A
  • Roots Brune O. The second-to-last beer, and one which I couldn't really taste properly. It seemed in possession of that stale sourness, but not overwhelmingly. There was some spiciness, and maybe some dark fruit, but my tongue couldn't do it justice. Rating: C+, with a big caveat for rater unreliability.
  • Silver Moon Saison de Moon. Like Floreal, another beer that tried to work with the yeast. Silver Moon's was a darker beer, but quite nice. The yeast can really offer a wonderful spice along with a dry, tasty finish. Rating: B+
  • Upright Mingus and Monk. If Floreal was a great beer in expressing the yeast's character, this was a great beer in ignoring it. A tremendous amount going on in Mingus and Monk, which was at turns rich and sweet, like a dessert, and at times sharp and tart. I had a sense brewers Alex Ganum and Corey Blodgett were trying to blow the lid off this beer in terms of richness (barrel aged with currents soaked in fortified wine?--so decadent). Doc Wort thinks it could age, and I agree--but it will get a bit sharper and drier and the brett will knock some of those tongue-pleasing notes into minor key. It's perfect now, and it will be perfect--and perfectly different--in a few months. I hope to get to try it then. Rating: A
  • Widmer Biere de Table. This beer didn't get the love I thought it deserved. It was as if people weren't giving it a chance--just swilling it and moving on to more florid offerings. Well, they missed a lushly understated beer. It had a crisp nose with what I thought were light phenolics. I brewed a grisette with the Dupont strain last year, and got this same quality, so when I saw brewer Ben Dobler, I asked if he'd used wheat in the recipe--he had. I think that helped pull out some of the yeast's spice. It was highly carbonated and lively on the tongue and would, I suspect, be a great friend to food. Sally's fave, and one of my finest four. Rating: A
I gave four beers As, something I try not to do too often. But I don't think it's grade inflation either (a charge leveled at me in the past)--the average of all the other beers is a B-. These four are the kinds of beers I would be happy to drink every day; the kinds of beers that leap into your mind when you're in the mood for a particular style. I didn't just admire them, I liked them. I don't expect Big Horse or Upright to replicate these beers, but consider this my official appeal to Widmer and Rock Bottom to consider doing an encore.

Overall, a great fest.


Update. Bill and Angelo have added their reviews.

Update 2. We have a winner: Block 15 La Fermé de Demons. They will have the right to select the yeast for next year's fest. Generally the winner gets to host, but apparently PDX retains the right, so I'm not sure who will host in Block 15's stead. The top six vote-getters speak well for the crowd, too: Cascade Brewing's Frite Galois, Green Dragon's King Ghidorah, Hopworks' DiaBlato, Oakshire's La Ferme, and Upright's Mingus and Monk. Congrats all around.

As I look back at that list, I notice soemthing interesting. Every one of the breweries in the top six except Cascade was established in the last three or four years. In other words, the kids are all right.
_____________
Share

18 comments:

dr wort said...

I'll put ABC grades on my reviews too.

Nice write up.

Bill Night said...

If it makes you feel any better, I didn't like the Block 15 either, and I usually like their stuff a lot. My notes call it syrupy, but I think your "incomplete" description is good -- it seemed like it wasn't ready yet.

I guess I'll add letter grades to my post also, though I mostly avoided talking about the beers I didn't like.

Jeff Alworth said...

I would hope people regard my grades as reflections both of my opinion of the beer quality, but also personal preference. The big lesson I learned was that two people can have pretty similar critical appraisals of a beer and react very differently. I dinged both Block 15 and Oakshire, and yet they're two of my favorite breweries.

kscaldef said...

It's been interesting to see how much variation there is in people's opinions. Sadly, I have to say that Upright was the big disappointment of the day for me: too much raw wood taste, edging into burnt. Maybe I'll like it more after a bit more aging.

On the Cascade, I agree that it was merely very good :-)

My favorites were probably Block 15, Big Horse, and Green Dragon (although I only had a couple sips of the last, not a full taster).

Overall, I felt like there were a lot of conceptually interesting but poorly executed beers, which is maybe not that surprising given the rules of the game. Many beers were interesting to have a sip or two of, but difficult to power through even a 4oz pour. I don't think there were more than a handful that I'd want to drink a full pint of.

dr wort said...

Curious to see which yeast we'll be tasting next year. I'd kind of like to see:


Wyeast 3463 Forbidden Fruit

For production of wits to classic grand cru. Phenolic profile with subdued fruitiness. Well balanced estery profile.

Origin:
Flocculation: Low
Attenuation: 72-76%
Temperature Range: 63-76F, 17-24C
Alcohol Tolerance: 12% ABV

or

Wyeast 1762 Belgian Abbey II™

High gravity yeast with distinct warming character from ethanol production. Slightly fruity with dry finish, low ester profile.

Origin:
Flocculation: medium
Attenuation: 73-77%
Temperature Range: 65-75° F (18-24° C)
Alcohol Tolerance: approximately 12% ABV

DA Beers said...

Doc,

Funny, I made a comment about using the forbidden fruit yeast as well. I think this or the Trappist High Gravity Westmalle would be pretty easy to work with.. although the Westmalle would need more conditioning time to rid the big green apple notes up front.

I would opt against the Abbey 2 Rochefort strain though. As much as I love that strain, it doesn't really have a distinctive character.

dr wort said...

@ DA

Forbidden Fruit is my first choice. The other was a quick throw away choice... ;-}

Looks like we both predicted the winner of this one! :-O

See ya in Corvallis!

@Jeff

It's OK Jeffery... Dry your eyes. Need a tissue? :-)

Looks like your steadfast Portland favs just got a little kick in the nuts. Oh well... there's always next year... in CORVALLIS!

Kidding aside; Hopworks, Old Lompoc (which didn't get a nod), Rogue and others all served up some real nice beers.

Sorry, just had to give ya a bad time. :-O

Anonymous said...

Jeff, in case you were unaware of what diacetyl smells like... check out the Mingus & Monk again

DA Beers said...

Anon,

Odd, I didn't detect diacetyl in the M&M and I'm typically pretty sensitive to it. Could be some pedio throwing it off from the souring process.

Jeff Alworth said...

Doc--I've always been ahead of the curve in my tastes, so I don't mind standing alone!

As to yeasts, I'm thinking it's time to go whole hog: 3278 Lambic blend! Or maybe you prefer 3763 Roselare (Rodenbach). Call it year of the funk. I'll DJ and bust out my Parliament.

Given that I think that's not likely, how about the Duvel 1388 strain. Except for the massive CO2 it produces, it's pretty quick and, I would expect, versatile.

Anon, I'm with Derek--no diacetyl I could detect (and I'm also sensitive to it). And given that it sat in tanks so long, I don't see how it could have had diacetyl.

DA Beers said...

Jeff,

I wasn't aware that the Duvel strain produced excess co2, why is that? Are you sure it just isn't a higher carbonation level in the bottle?

Jeff Alworth said...

DA,

No, it's a crazy yeast. I've used it a couple of times, and I love it. But a word to the wise: don't prime! Just let it go on its own. You still end up with amazing fizz.

Here's the langauge of art from Wyeast: "May continue to produce CO2 for an extended period after packaging or collection, while in refrigerated storage."

All of this talk of yeast makes me think it's time to do another poll! Doc, in particular, loves dem polls.

DA Beers said...

So Jeff it sounds more like the French Saison that Upright uses, it just takes forever to truly finish? I can't imagine that the yeast somehow leaves more CO2 in solution then a typical yeast strain. Then again, I've never used that strain.

Drew said...

Jeff,

You are not alone in your B15 opinion. I know Nick himself almost pulled the beer out of the fest because he felt it wasn't ready. I just sent him a text and he said the beer is back in barrels (no American oak this time) with more brett b. added, and he added a bourbon barrel. Look for some in bottles in Oct.
Too bad he couldn't have the fest in Corvallis, he's got a great spot for a big tent in the parking lot next door where he did his Bloktoberfest.

dr wort said...

Jeff,

You may be ahead of the curve, but you're driving in the wrong lane. ;-}

Jeff Alworth said...

Drew, thanks for the update--I feel slightly better now. Maybe we should lobby for a Corvallis fest. I don't know who actually has the power to decide those things, but why not Corvallis? Block 15 won, after all. Call it Greater Portland Cheers to Belgian Beers.

Doc, after Camper Van Beethoven broke up, lead singer David Lowry formed a band called Cracker that had a song with these lyrics:

"I see the light at the end of the tunnel--
Someone please tell me it's not a train."

Dr Love said...

Regarding hosting the event, the festival has gotten large enough that we're going to find a permanent home for it in Portland. A location that can fit up to 3000 and has both inside and outside areas (just in case of rain). Thoughts?

Block 15 said...

Jeff-
Great write up, pre and post fest. I have posted a bit of my thoughts in my Brewer's Brain journal for those that are interested.

http://block15.com/brewers-brain/

Post a Comment

NOTE: Blogspot has been eating some comments, and there doesn't seem to be anything I can do about it. IF your comment doesn't appear, it's not you, it's not me, it's the genuiuses at Google. Sorry--